MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Elijah Cham [] vs Tushar Sharma [] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-2-Head: Cham 1 - 0 Sharma

They have played 2 sets in total, with Cham winning 2 and Sharma winning 0. The last match between Cham and Sharma was at the M15 Tauranga, 15-12-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Elijah Cham getting the victory 6-0 6-0.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Elijah Cham 1
Tushar Sharma 0
Cham vs Sharma H2H Profile
Cham Stats Sharma
0% (0-0) YTD Win/Loss 40% (2-3)
1 Head-to-Head 0
N/A Ranking N/A
Highest Rank N/A
21 Age 24
- Plays -
0 Titles 0
60% (12-8) Career Total W/L 14% (13-77)
$0 Career Prize Money $0
1 Hard H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Cham VS Sharma H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-0 6-0
cross
Elijah Cham
Player
Tushar Sharma
58% ( 19 of 33)
1st Serve %
59% ( 32 of 54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79% ( 15 of 19)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 13 of 32)
64% ( 9 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
27% ( 9 of 33)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 34 of 54)
58
Total Points Won
29

Cham VS Sharma H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Cham Vs Sharma H2H Stats
Elijah Cham Cham Stats Tushar Sharma Sharma
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 0
0 Aces (Total) 0
1 Total Double Faults 2
0:59:0 Average Match Time 0:59:0
58% (19/33) 1st Serve % 59% (32/54)
79% (15/19) 1st Serve Win % 41% (13/32)
64% (9/14) 2nd Serve Win % 32% (7/22)
50% (6/12) Break Points Won % (Total) 0% (0/0)
63% (34/54) Return Points Win % 27% (9/33)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Elijah Cham vs Tushar Sharma Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Cham 1 - 0 Sharma

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cham has won 40.1% of points on their second serve, while Sharma has won 34.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cham, in recent form, has won 50.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sharma has won 33.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.05% and 18.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Cham has saved 56.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sharma has saved 47.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Cham has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 9/ 5), with Sharma winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Cham has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 9/ 7). Sharma has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 16% (W/L 12/ 65), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Cham has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 9/ 5), where as Sharma has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 30% of matches (W/L 3/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cham winning 1 times and Sharma being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cham winning 2 and Sharma winning 0. The last match between Cham and Sharma was at the M15 Tauranga, 15-12-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Elijah Cham getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:59:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Cham and Sharma have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cham winning 0 times and Sharma 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cham winning 0, and Sharma 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cham has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.43 while Sharma has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cham has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sharma has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Cham has converted 46.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sharma has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Elijah Cham Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Lawrence Bataljin
    Player
    Elijah Cham
    62% ( 43 of 69)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 48 of 77)
    0
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    44% ( 19 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 25 of 48)
    58% ( 15 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 14 of 29)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    51% ( 35 of 69)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 38 of 77)
    72
    Total Points Won
    74
    L
    2-6 6-3 16-14 H2H
    Q2
    cross
    Elijah Cham
    Player
    Tushar Sharma
    58% ( 19 of 33)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 32 of 54)
    -
    Aces
    -
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    79% ( 15 of 19)
    1st Serve Won
    41% ( 13 of 32)
    64% ( 9 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 7 of 22)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    27% ( 9 of 33)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 34 of 54)
    58
    Total Points Won
    29
    W
    6-0 6-0 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Tai Sach
    Player
    Elijah Cham
    51% ( 52 of 101)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 70 of 120)
    5
    Aces
    0
    6
    Double Faults
    7
    75% ( 39 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 41 of 70)
    41% ( 20 of 49)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 22 of 50)
    32% ( 6 of 19)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    42% ( 42 of 101)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 57 of 120)
    116
    Total Points Won
    105
    L
    6-4 6-7(8) 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Elijah Cham
    Player
    Cade Birrell
    69% ( 38 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    49% ( 36 of 74)
    1
    Aces
    4
    0
    Double Faults
    13
    71% ( 27 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    83% ( 30 of 36)
    76% ( 13 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    24% ( 9 of 38)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    27% ( 15 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 35 of 74)
    75
    Total Points Won
    54
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    William Grant
    Player
    Elijah Cham
    73% ( 35 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 30 of 62)
    4
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    4
    80% ( 28 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 15 of 32)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    31% ( 15 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 32 of 62)
    65
    Total Points Won
    45
    L
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Elijah Cham
    Player
    Alexander Frusina
    62% ( 52 of 84)
    1st Serve %
    41% ( 25 of 61)
    1
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    62% ( 32 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 15 of 25)
    38% ( 12 of 32)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 16 of 36)
    67% ( 6 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    48% ( 40 of 84)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 30 of 61)
    74
    Total Points Won
    71
    W
    6-4 1-6 6-0 H2H
    QF
    W
    7-5 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Isaac Becroft
    Player
    Elijah Cham
    89% ( 34 of 38)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 31 of 55)
    2
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    4
    76% ( 26 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 21 of 31)
    100% ( 4 of 4)
    2nd Serve Won
    17% ( 4 of 24)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    21% ( 8 of 38)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 30 of 55)
    60
    Total Points Won
    33
    L
    6-1 6-2 H2H

    Tushar Sharma Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q2
    cross
    Kanan Gasimov
    Player
    Tushar Sharma
    58% ( 18 of 31)
    1st Serve %
    73% ( 27 of 37)
    1
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    83% ( 15 of 18)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 13 of 27)
    69% ( 9 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    23% ( 7 of 31)
    Rtn Points Won
    54% ( 20 of 37)
    44
    Total Points Won
    24
    L
    6-1 4-1 ret. H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-2 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-0 6-1 H2H
    Q2
    L
    6-2 6-0 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-1 7-6(5) H2H
    Q2
    cross
    Elijah Cham
    Player
    Tushar Sharma
    58% ( 19 of 33)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 32 of 54)
    -
    Aces
    -
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    79% ( 15 of 19)
    1st Serve Won
    41% ( 13 of 32)
    64% ( 9 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 7 of 22)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    27% ( 9 of 33)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 34 of 54)
    58
    Total Points Won
    29
    L
    6-0 6-0 H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-1 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-0 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Dharmil Shah
    Player
    Tushar Sharma
    58% ( 31 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    43% ( 28 of 65)
    11
    Aces
    14
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    87% ( 27 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    79% ( 22 of 28)
    64% ( 14 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    49% ( 18 of 37)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    23% ( 12 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 25 of 65)
    66
    Total Points Won
    52
    L
    7-5 6-4 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Cham & Sharma Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Elijah Cham Cham Stats Tushar Sharma Sharma
    60% (12/8) Win/Loss 14% (13/77)
    61% (28/18) Sets Win/Loss 18% (34/156)
    54% (246/208) Games Win/Loss 34% (558/1077)
    0.05 Aces Per Game 0.04
    12 Aces Total 32
    0.12 Double Faults Per Game 0.07
    27 Total Double Faults 54
    1st Match Average Match Time 1st Match
    157.1 Average Opponent Rank 147.54
    60% (423/700) 1st Serve % 59% (583/994)
    61% (260/423) 1st Serve Win % 52% (303/583)
    48% (132/277) 2nd Serve Win % 36% (150/411)
    51% (34/67) Break Points Won % (Total) 28% (19/67)
    44% (284/639) Return Points Win % 32% (286/887)
    60% (12/20) Best of 3 Sets Win % 13% (12/89)
    0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (1/1)
    100% (3/3) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 50% (3/6)
    33% (2/6) Deciding Set Win % 11% (1/9)
    85% (13/11) 1st Set Won, Won Match 71% (17/12)
    15% (13/2) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 29% (17/5)
    14% (7/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 1% (73/1)

    Other Predictions

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    20 Apr
    flag
    16:00
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...